From the Worldwide Faith News archives www.wfn.org
U.S. Churches Must Brace for the Impact of Welfare Reform
From
PCUSA.NEWS@pcusa.org
Date
14 Nov 1997 12:58:22
4-November-1997
97421
Economist Says U.S. Churches Must Brace
for the Impact of Welfare Reform
by Julian Shipp
LOUISVILLE, Ky.--A nationally renowned economist says the nation's churches
must brace for the impact of welfare reform now that the 61-year-old system
has been dismantled by the federal government.
Dr. Teresa Amott, associate professor of economics at Bucknell
University in Lewisberg, Pa., was among the panelists during the Nov. 1-3
consultation titled "Service and Advocacy Ministry in the New Welfare
Reality," sponsored by the General Assembly Council (GAC). More than 200
Presbyterians, many of them staff members and elected leaders from
presbyteries and synods, gathered to address and discuss a variety of
welfare reform questions.
Last year, the 104th Congress passed legislation that left states with
new responsibilities for welfare while requiring the majority of America's
2.4 million welfare recipients to shift from welfare to work within a
limited time frame. Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) -- the
replacement for Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) -- limits
the use of federal funds for welfare to a maximum of five years in the
lifetime of adults and requires them to move into the workforce within two
years.
Some funds are made available for job training and work readiness
programs, but none are devoted to job creation, and no job is guaranteed by
the federal government to the person whose time limits for assistance
expire.
Integral to the new system is the fact that federal funds are no longer
guaranteed to individuals who qualify but are instead given to the states
as block grants. These grants are fixed on the basis of AFDC funds received
by individual states earlier in the 1990s and are guaranteed at that level
until 2002. Additionally, there are few federal requirements or guidelines,
and the states have broad latitude to create their own welfare-to-work
programs and to determine whether and how the system will meet the needs of
individuals.
Consequently, Amott said, congregations over the next five years will
increasingly feel the impact of welfare reform on their service ministries,
many of which are already taxed to capacity or near-capacity levels.
"Every month there may be one or two new alerts," Amott predicted.
"There will be telephone trees calling you and saying, `Do something about
this.' Over time, the service and advocacy demands will escalate and the
church will be called upon in terms that are as strong as those words of
the prophet [Micah]. It will feel like such a time as this."
Amott said the most obvious demand will occur as people are terminated
from AFDC and begin to receive sanctions (meaning they lose part, if not
all, of their welfare benefits). This action cuts the social safety net
that supports individuals, families and communities suffering from economic
dislocation.
Though there are many obstacles to implementing the commonly called
"welfare-to-work" plan, one of the most serious is the low wage women
leaving welfare can expect to earn, according to the Presbyterian
Washington Office.
Most welfare recipients are women and children. Adults on the welfare
rolls typically have low levels of education, training and job experience.
Women leaving welfare usually qualify for, and are placed in, low-paid
service, administrative and clerical positions. All of these are
female-dominated jobs, mostly at minimum wage, which is not enough to lift
a family out of poverty.
Many welfare recipients are already working but do not earn enough to
support their families. A study by the Institute for Women's Research
tracked welfare recipients over a two-year period and found that 43 percent
of them combined welfare with a substantial amount of paid employment. This
employment, however, was usually at a poverty-level wage.
With federal welfare assistance diminished, Amott said, the poor and
needy will turn to religious- and community-based food pantries, feeding
programs and shelters, perhaps in record numbers. She said there are
studies that suggest that as much as 40 percent of the current welfare
caseload will eventually be impacted by the five-year time limit, and an
estimated 20 percent of current welfare recipients will immediately be
affected because they already have been on welfare for five years.
Simultaneously, these people will be required to participate in work
activities, presenting another significant challenge to churches.
For instance, Amott said, congregations will have to ask whether
churches should serve as sites for "workfare" people. While acknowledging
that fulfilling this need could present congregations with new
opportunities for reconciliation, job training and spiritual formation as
they minster to the poor, it also raises the issue of child care. In the
new welfare reality, Amott said, child-care programs are inadequate, so
churches will likely be called upon to care for children whose mothers and
fathers are participating in work activities.
"It used to be the working poor were a smaller group. Now they're going
to be a bigger group," Amott said. "The church then, serving as a new
safety net, is possibly implicated in very serious and deep ways in the
actual provision of the new welfare. However, we must never lose sight of
that prophetic voice ... and to love one another in such a way as to ask
ourselves always, `Were I a welfare recipient, what would I ask of the
church?'"
------------
For more information contact Presbyterian News Service
phone 502-569-5504 fax 502-569-8073
E-mail PCUSA.NEWS@pcusa.org Web page: http://www.pcusa.org
mailed from World Faith News <wfn-news@wfn.org>
--
Browse month . . .
Browse month (sort by Source) . . .
Advanced Search & Browse . . .
WFN Home