From the Worldwide Faith News archives www.wfn.org
GMP calls for policy review aimed at eliminating racism and sexism
From
"Disciples Off. of Communication"<wshuffit@oc.disciples.org>
Date
26 Aug 1999 13:40:17
Date: August 26, 1999
Disciples News Service
Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)
Contact: Clifford L. Willis
E-mail: CWillis@oc.disciples.org
on the Web: http://www.disciples.org
99a-57
INDIANAPOLIS (DNS) – The executive leaders of the three racial/ethnic
groups of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) say they are in
"stern and united opposition to the recent election of a new president of
the Disciples Seminary Foundation (DSF)." The Disciples-related
institution, founded in 1960, serves Disciples seminarians, clergy and lay
persons with theological and continuing education programs and resources
in the western United States.
In an "open letter" to general minister and president Dr. Richard Hamm,
the Revs. Geunhee Yu, Lucas Torres and John Foulkes express grave
misgivings over the process that led to the May election of Mary Anne
Parrott to succeed retiring foundation President Don Reisinger. Yu is
executive pastor for North American Asian ministries. Torres is the
Disciples national Hispanic pastor. Foulkes is administrative secretary of
the National Convocation, the church's African American fellowship.
According to Hamm, two years ago the DSF executive committee started a
selection process for president that provided for consideration of current
executive staff members only. Those three staff members are white. "While
I do not believe the executive committee was motivated by bigotry, such an
internal selection process does unwittingly participate in the patterns of
institutional racism that are so rampant across the life of our church,"
Hamm wrote in a response to the open letter.
Hamm and Dennis Landon, president of the Division of Higher Education,
traveled to Los Angeles Aug. 13 to speak with Reisinger, Parrott and DSF
board members. Hamm proposed that:
-- The DSF board needs perhaps six racial/ethnic minority members on the
18-member body, up from the current three.
-- The board's executive committee should include racial/ethnic minority
members.
-- Future search committees should include representatives of
racial/ethnic minorities.
-- The board needs to provide for some kind of dialogue with and
racial/ethnic minority leaders in order to understand their concerns and
needs.
A week later, the same topics were further discussed when Reisinger
traveled to Indianapolis for a conference with Yu, Foulkes, Torres and
Hamm.
The original open letter called on Hamm to denounce the closed process
employed in Parrott's election.
In his response, Hamm pledged that he will send pastoral letters to all
boards of all general units, regions, institutions of higher education and
Disciples-related organizations to "reaffirm that closed search processes
are inappropriate."
The open letter also called for rescission of Parrott's election and the
immediate appointment of a "five member nominating and search committee
... to find the best candidates for the position of president of DSF, no
less than two of which will be affiliated with an ethnic minority group,
and none of which can be current members of the DSF board."
The general minister pointed out that Disciples institutions, as well as
congregations, operate under the direction of their own boards. "It is not
within my power to command the DSF board," Hamm said.
At the time of this writing, there's no word on whether or how the DSF
board will respond to the criticism of its search process. "I feel it's
basically inappropriate for me to make comments until after a meeting with
the chair of the board of trustees," said DSF President Reisinger.
Finally, the open letter demanded that a "complete redrafting of the
election procedures be undertaken for all Disciples-related institutions
to ensure that such a situation never arises again."
In response Hamm said, "I believe that the time has come for the church
to review its policies and procedures with an eye to eliminating all
expressions of institutional racism and sexism." Acting on that belief, he
committed to the following actions:
-- sending the letter reaffirming that closed search processes are
inappropriate;
-- making institutional racism the educational theme at the July 2000
meeting of the General Board of the Christian Church (Disciples of
Christ);
-- directing that the next meeting of the Standing Committee on Renewal
and Structural Reform consider: ways to ensure diversity on boards and
committees across the church; policies and procedures that will guarantee
that all people have equal opportunity in the Christian Church (Disciples
of Christ); how to develop in the next two years a written policy calling
for open executive search processes;
-- being alert for executive transitions across the church and giving
advice and counsel that will foster open and fair search processes;
-- consulting with the General Anti-Racism/Pro-reconciliation Team and
racial/ethnic Disciples groups, asking for specific proposals for
preparing and recruiting a broader selection of racial/ethnic minority
persons to serve on boards and committees;
-- arranging a consultation between racial/ethnic minority leadership and
the Council on Theological Education of the Division of Higher Education
to develop ways to increase outreach to minority persons and to include
them fully within the life of Disciples theological institutions and;
-- convening a consultation including general, regional and educational
leadership in early 2000 regarding "these and related issues." The
consultation will include a majority of African American, American Asian
and Hispanic Disciples.
-- end --
Browse month . . .
Browse month (sort by Source) . . .
Advanced Search & Browse . . .
WFN Home