From the Worldwide Faith News archives www.wfn.org
Episcopalians: Words over deeds: the background of the East Carolina case
From
dmack@episcopalchurch.org
Date
Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:08:17 -0400
June 5, 2003
2003-123a
Episcopalians: Words over deeds: the background of the East
Carolina case
by Scott Nunn
(ENS) The controversy over who owns the property of St. Andrew's
Episcopal Church in Morehead City, North Carolina dates back
more than three years.
In March of 2000, the vestry of St. Andrew's notified Bishop
Clifton Daniel III that it was withdrawing the congregation from
the Diocese of East Carolina and the Episcopal Church in the
United States. The vestry said it was withdrawing because of the
Episcopal Church's "unrebuked rejection of the authority of Holy
Scripture," and joining the "Interim Anglican Expression in the
U.S.," otherwise known as the Anglican Mission in America, under
the authority of Bishop Charles Murphy. The vestry also said it
had clear deed to all property.
In a letter to the people of St. Andrew's, Daniel said that
while any individual may choose to leave the diocese, a vestry
has no authority to withdraw an entire congregation. Daniel also
said that while some may have chosen to leave the Episcopal
Church, "St. Andrew's Episcopal Church has not been dissolved
and is a continuing parish of The Episcopal Church and Diocese
of East Carolina." At this moment, he continued in the letter,
St. Andrew's Episcopal Church does not have a legally
constituted vestry or wardens.
Daniel asked those members who chose to remain in the Episcopal
Church to meet with him. A group met, elected a new vestry and
began worshiping at Morehead City Middle School. They are now
meeting in a former bank.
On March 29, 2000, Daniel sent a letter to the leaders of the
breakaway group requesting them to vacate the property and turn
all assets and records over to him.
The breakaway group did not comply with Daniel's request and on
May 12, 2000, a complaint was filed in Carteret County Superior
Court by the Diocese of East Carolina, Daniel, and Nicholas F.
Theuner, Harriet Gruber, and Dorothy Raney, acting as vestrymen
of St. Andrew's Episcopal Church.
The lawsuit asked the court to rule that all of the properties
owned in the name of St. Andrew's Episcopal Church and
beneficially owned by the diocese be immediately restored to the
diocese; that the plaintiffs be declared the owners of all real
estate; and that the defendants be restrained from the use of
the name "St. Andrew's Episcopal Church," or any designation
"confusingly similar."
The case went to court in July 2001, but ended in a mistrial
after the jury could not reach a verdict. A retrial was
scheduled for January of 2002 before Judge John Jolly.
Before the retrial lawyers for the plaintiffs filed a motion for
summary judgment, arguing that there were no questions of fact
for a jury to decide and asked the judge simply to apply the
appropriate law to the case.
On Jan. 10, 2002, Jolly issued a summary judgment in favor of
the diocese and the group that remained part of the Episcopal
Church. The summary judgment ordered all property turned back
over to the plaintiffs; the cloud cleared from the titles; and
an accounting of all monies and assets. The judge also barred
the breakaway group from using the name "St. Andrew's," but
denied the plaintiffs' request that the defendants bear all
legal costs.
On Jan. 18, Jolly issued a Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal, with
the following conditions:
-- Within 30 days the defendants (the AMiA group) were required
to make a detailed written accounting to the plaintiffs for all
personal property, tangible and intangible, such as cash, bank
accounts, securities, etc., and account for all expenditures,
disposal or loss of assets from March 12, 2000.
-- The defendants were to post a bond in the amount of $350,000
for the purpose of assuring all monetary payment and delivery of
real property and to protect the plaintiffs from damages that
may be suffered by them while the defendants remain in
possession of the property should there occur any waste.
-- During the stay, the defendants were to keep all real and
personal property in good and reasonable condition and not waste
any such properties.
-- Defendants were to insure against loss from fire, theft,
wind and hail and other casualty risks all buildings and
fixtures in a sum equal to replacement costs.
-- Defendants were to pay all taxes and all indebtedness of the
church organization.
-- Plaintiffs were to have temporary possession of the
sanctuary and parish hall at Arendell Street for weddings and
funerals, with proper notice given.
------
--Scott Nunn is editor of Cross Current and web editor for the
Episcopal Diocese of East Carolina.
Browse month . . .
Browse month (sort by Source) . . .
Advanced Search & Browse . . .
WFN Home