From the Worldwide Faith News archives www.wfn.org
TCN: Aborigine turn down “permanent housing” in favor of preserving their culture
From
"Taiwan Church News" <enews@pctpress.org>
Date
Tue, 22 Sep 2009 04:51:07 -0700
> Taiwan Church News
>3003 Edition
>September 14-20, 2009
Aborigine turn down “permanent housing” in favor of preserving their culture
>Reported by Chiou Kuo-rong
>Written by Lydia Ma
“Buddhist Tzu-Chi Foundation’s official statement says it is building “permanent
housing” for Aborigines to allow nature to “rest”, but such an initiative will force
Aborigines to leave their homes and their roots and force them to bid farewell to
life in the mountains. For this reason, we protest against permanent housing,”
said Hsiao Shih-hui, a member of the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan (PCT) and
Secretary of Association for Taiwan Indigenous Peoples' Policies.
According to Hsiao, Tzu-Chi Foundation and Taiwanese government have been
vigorously promoting and advertising “permanent housing” for Aborigines in the
aftermath of Typhoon Morakot, and their marketing strategies have greatly
influenced the general public’s perception, resulting in most people believing
Aborigines have voluntarily chosen to leave behind their original homes in favor
of living in “permanent housing” built by Tzu-Chi. In contrast, the true desires and
>voices of Aborigines continue to be ignored.
To offer a balanced perspective, the PCT Indigenous Ministry Committee and
more than 30 other Aborigine organizations drafted and signed a petition
together, and held a press conference on September 10th in front of the
Legislative Yuan. They hoped that Taiwan’s new Premier Wu Den-yih would
reverse his predecessor’s post-typhoon reconstruction policies that utterly ignore
Aborigine perspectives, needs, and cultures. For Aborigines, promoting
“permanent housing” with total disregard for their attachment to nature is
tantamount to destroying their culture and way of life forever.
Protesters also criticized former Premier Liu Chao-shuan during the press
conference for failing to take into account the opinions of Aborigines before
diving into permanent housing projects. Hsiao also read aloud a letter addressed
to the new premier written by various Aborigine organizations. The letter was
written using an exam format and included many questions for the new Premier.
One of the questions was, “Will you respect Aborigine victims and see them as
>autonomous ethnic groups?”
The petition also shed light on Chu-Tzi organization’s patronizing attitude toward
Aborigines in the reconstruction process, focusing especially on Chu-Tzi
organization and former Premier Liu’s total disregard for local residents whose
homes were destroyed by the Typhoon. It went on to ask Premier Wu to dissolve
the rebuilding committee set by his predecessor and select a new slate of
committee members that would include tribal leaders.
Another question in the “exam” for the Premier was: “Aborigines are crying out
because they want to return home, do you hear their cries?” Though Aborigines
are grateful for “permanent housing”, the letter stated that such measures are not
necessary. What they need instead is temporary housing because rebuilding
their homes is a serious matter affecting the future and development of Aborigine
communities and such a decision mustn’t be made hastily, especially when it
may involve a decision to move reserves to a vastly different location altogether.
The third question in the “exam” was, “Do you plan to make all information on
rebuilding efforts transparent and public and allow residents to participate in the
rebuilding process?” Explanations following this question claimed that
government policies aimed at allowing the land to “rest” by relocating entire
tribes elsewhere are merely excuses to deflect the government’s own
responsibility in destroying the environment. Therefore, transparency and
participation from locals in the rebuilding process are necessary to ensure
problems aren’t concealed and new buildings are built properly.
According to a Rukai Reconstruction Alliance delegate, Rev. Palri, former
Premier Liu’s policies would forever separate Aborigines from their original
homes and now Aborigines want to make sure the new Premier is aware that
they want to eventually return home. Six Rukai tribes forced to evacuate when
their homes were washed away already voted en masse against accepting
permanent housing from Tzu-Chi and government agencies so that they could
rebuild their own homes in the mountains. Their plight has mostly been ignored or
drowned out when government agencies, Tzu-Chi, and media networks began
>promoting permanent housing.
As a PCT Indigenous Ministry Committee delegate and a typhoon victim, Rev.
Palri told Premier Wu that administrative procedures, timing, and location
surrounding reconstruction efforts have all been wrong-headed so far and urged
>him to scrap his predecessor’s agenda.
Government agencies have recently been promoting “permanent housing”
reconstruction policies while some social organizations have provided
“temporary housing”. “Permanent housing” would allow typhoon victims to build
new communities on government-owned lands and settle there indefinitely.
Though they may live on and use these lands, they do not hold rights or
ownership over the lands or the houses built. “Temporary housing” would provide
victims with a good place to settle down and continue on with life while they
gather strength and find means to rebuild their own homes.
In related news, an alliance of Aborigine residents in Kaohsiung County held a
press conference on September 8th at one of the military barracks they had been
staying to protest that government reconstruction policies are not benefiting
Aborigines. They demanded that public agencies put more effort into rebuilding
broken roads so that they can return to rebuild their own homes.
According to this alliance’s chairperson, Rev. Lituan from South Bunun
Presbytery, returning home is the only option for Namasiya residents because
Aborigines must learn to coexist with nature and that is their way of life.
Therefore, the alliance not only demanded government agencies to speed up
road reconstruction, but also requested officials to lay out clearly how many more
days victims will be staying at the military barracks. The alliance also requested
to know the purpose of “permanent housing” and why Aborigines must give up
their lands in the mountains to take up “permanent housing” at government
>sanctioned locations.
Commenting on the reconstruction committee convened by the government, Rev.
Lituan said government reconstruction policies dictate that at least one-fifth of
committee members must be locals from affected areas, but, up until now,
typhoon victims have been underrepresented. For example, the representative
from Namasiya Township in the reconstruction committee is the township major,
or someone who may ultimately side with the national government instead of the
>residents if cajoled by top officials.
According to this Aborigine alliance, public officials cannot be counted to truly
represent the views of typhoon victims because they are easily co-opted to go
along with whatever policies the Ma administration wants to push through and
typhoon victims will only wind up as victims once again. The purpose of this
Aborigine alliance in Kaohsiung is to pressure the government to come up with
better, long-term reconstruction plans because one pregnant woman had already
died while staying in military barracks due to inadequate government planning
>and medical malpractice.
One Taoyuan Township leader said he was very dissatisfied with government
reconstruction efforts so far because they only focused on areas with the highest
reported rate of fatalities. However, places such as Taoyuan and Namasiya
townships were also badly damaged by the typhoon but remain
underrepresented in the reconstruction committee. Furthermore, unless one is a
local from Namasiya or Taoyuan, it is very difficult to really understand what
victims need most. Therefore, residents are demanding that the committee
should have more than one delegate from Taoyuan Township.
For typhoon victims, it is only by returning to their former homes that their lives
can be rebuilt. However, in view of the daunting challenges ahead, and the
possibility that some aboriginal reserves will ultimately have to be relocated,
Lituan said the alliance of Aborigine residents in Kaohsiung County will also
respect the wishes and needs of each individual reserve.
>********************
Taiwan Church News is published weekly in Taiwan's local languages.
You may translate and re-use our articles online only if you acknowledge the source as
"Taiwan Church News" and list the names of the reporter and writer.
Contact us before reprinting any of our articles for print publications.
Direct comments and questions about this article to: enews@pctpress.org
Visit our website for more news at: http://enews.pctpress.org/ (English) http://www.pctpress.org (Chinese)
>********************
>
>
Browse month . . .
Browse month (sort by Source) . . .
Advanced Search & Browse . . .
WFN Home