wfn.org | WCC Assembly Press Release 8

[George Conklin <gconklin@wfn.org>]

WCC Eighth Assembly
Press Release No. 8
For Immediate Use
5 December 1998

CANCELLATION OF DEBT SHOULD INCLUDE DIALOGUE,
WCC LEADERS TELL JOURNALISTS

The World Council of Churches intends to propose the cancellation of debt
to the world*s poorest nations, but not without a dialogue with borrowers
and lenders, the WCC General Secretary told a press conference Saturday (5
December).

*Modalities of relief are to be determined together,* said the Rev. Dr
Konrad Raiser.  The Council will also propose that *the use of the funds to
be released* will be discussed so that the citizens of poor nations will
reap some of the benefits.

The debt cancellation proposal will come later in the WCC*s Eighth
Assembly, meeting in Harare, Zimbabwe, 3-14 December.  The proposal is
inspired by the Council*s 50th anniversary this year, which invokes the
ideal of the biblical year of jubilee, under which Hebrew law stipulated
the cancellation of debts every 50 years.

Raiser and the Moderator of the WCC Central Committee, His Holiness Aram I,
met reporters a day after their reports to Assembly delegates.  Raiser*s
comments responded to a question as to whether the WCC would press *to
reduce corruption in African countries* as a part of its debt cancellation
proposal.

Aram responded that corruption was hardly unique to Africa.  *Corruption is
omnipresent,* he said.  *It is in all countries, all nations, in all
sectors of society, including in our churches.*

Raiser explained that while the WCC *is not an organisation to put pressure
on or propose conditions to governments*, he hopes the process will
*include a search for a new ethical borrowing and lending mechanism*. The
fault, he said, *is not only on the side of borrowers but also on the side
of lenders.  There has been unethical lending.*

The journalists* questions ranged widely and touched on the WCC*s
commitment to human rights, the Council*s relationship with its Orthodox
members, the call for an ecumenical forum and the WCC*s ability to openly
discuss controversial issues such as homosexuality.

A reporter asked Raiser which groups he hoped to invite to the *ecumenical
forum* that has been proposed to include Christian bodies not now members
of the WCC.  The General Secretary cited Pentecostals, Evangelicals and the
Roman Catholic Church among others, all of whom have signalled an interest
in considering the idea.

*The forum is not necessarily envisioned as a major meeting, or a meeting
at the world level,* he said.  *Perhaps it will take place at the regional
level.  It is too early to say what it will mean for future Assemblies.*

In response to another question about the Council*s difficulty in
discussing controversial issues such as homosexuality, Raiser said: *Some
churches find it difficult to accept this as a legitimate agenda and
therefore we will not receive much help from these churches. I would hope
that this Assembly will give us a mandate to begin a dialogue on moral and
ethical issues, including human sexuality,
 (but) I do not feel that we have been inhibited in these discussions so far.*

Both Aram and Raiser responded to a question about the role of Orthodox
churches in the decision-making processes of the Council.  The concern of
Orthodox churches, Aram said, is that their relatively small numbers should
not be allowed to impede their ability to influence those decisions.

Raiser said that he understood Orthodox concerns.  *If you have a 25 per
cent minority and you are faced with a 70 per cent majority . . . of
liberal Protestant representatives, there is a tendency (for the majority)
to say, OK, this is the Orthodox point of view but our point of view is a
different one and we will go the way we think the Council should go without
considering the Orthodox perspect
ive.*  In his report Friday, Raiser suggested a consensus model of
decision-making to involve all perspectives.

A question from a US journalist asked Raiser to expand on his admission
Friday that the *memory of the crisis caused by the 1978 grant to the
Patriotic Front of Zimbabwe/Rhodesia is still alive*. At the time, some
critics claimed that the grant by the WCC*s Programme to Combat Racism
might have been diverted for violent purposes rather than the educational
and development programmes for which it w
as intended.*

*I have never had doubt about the propriety and advisability of the grant,*
Raiser said.  He added that the advisability of the grant was affirmed two
years after it was made when Zimbabwe became independent.  *Today Zimbabwe
respects the rights of its white minority while giving equal rights to its
black majority,* he said.*

World Council of Churches
Press and Information Office, Harare
Tel:  +263.91.23.23.81
E-Mail:  jwn8@staff.wcc-coe.org
http://www.wcc-coe.org