From the Worldwide Faith News archives www.wfn.org
Committee Recommends PUB's Arrangement Be Upheld
From
PCUSA NEWS <pcusa.news@ecunet.org>
Date
15 Aug 1999 16:24:42
GA99046
22-June-1999
Committee Recommends
Publishing Corp's Arrangement
with Lay Committee Be Upheld
Benefits for Same-Sex Couples Debated
FORT WORTH With terms like "editorial control" and "micro-manage" bandied
about, the committee on Pensions, Benefits and Presbyterian Publishing
Corporation soundly defeated a `measure Monday night calling for the
General Assembly to put the brakes on a business venture between the
church's publishing company and the Presbyterian Lay Committee.
Meanwhile, proceedings may heat up even more today as the committee
tackles whether to recommend that a church agency explore implementing
policy providing employees in same- sex relationships with the same
employment benefits accorded to married couples.
The two proposals, one a resolution and the other an overture, were
highly debated into the night as public hearings to gain comment were held
here at the Radisson Plaza Hotel.
The measure pertaining to the Presbyterian Lay Committee, known as
Commissioner's Resolution 99-6, was brought to the body by John C. Bush,
Presbytery of Northern Alabama and Nancy J. Whiteley, Presbytery of
Shenandoah.
Robert Knight of Newton Presbytery described the resolution as
representing "editorial control" and suggested that it could set a
dangerous precedence.
"One you've decided who can and who can't use the services of the
church then who's next?"
Pipeline pipe bomb
The Presbyterian Publishing Corporation (PPC), the official
denominational publisher of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), recently
launched a new enterprise that markets, distributes and warehouses books
produced by theologically diverse groups for a nominal fee.
The service, called the Presbyterian Pipeline, grew out of an
agreement between PPC and the Presbyterian Lay Committee, which publishes
the conservative "Presbyterian Layman" newspaper and a confirmation
curriculum it prefers to that of the PC(USA). The Lay Committee and the
Layman, which are independent of the church, have been criticized by some
of undermining the denomination with their differing views.
"I'm grateful for the decision of the committee. I think they did the
right thing," said Parker T. Williamson, executive editor of "The
Presbyterian Layman." "I think it would have been a tragedy in the life of
the Presbyterian Church if this committee had gone along with a move to
censor those of us who represent a position that is contrary to the
position they hold. We believe that the position we hold is both solidly
Reformed and in the Christian tradition. We also believe that tradition is
held by most Presbyterians in this denomination."
Earlier in the evening the committee heard allegations of bitterness
by some favoring the resolution, describing the Layman as attacking and
lying about issues surrounding the denomination in an attempt to divide the
church.
Noting that he believes in "diversity" and the "free exchange of
ideas," Bill Galvin of Baltimore Presbytery said "there's a problem when
certain groups consistently undermine the work of the church ... and in
fact lie."
He said he was "shocked and appalled that an organization of our
church is aligned with this organization."
It's not the first time PC(USA) officials have examined its
relationship with the Lay Committee. In 1995 the General Assembly Special
Committee on Reconciliation met a number of times with the Lay Committee
and reported to the 1995 Assembly that its "destructive activities" in fact
"...undermine the work of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) and do great
damage to the integrity of Christ's body, the church...," the resolution
stated, citing Assembly minutes. But no action was taken since it was
concluded that the Assembly had no jurisdiction over the Lay Committee.
This year was no different as the resolution was easily defeated 34-7
before three comments by the committee were approved as part of its
recommendation to the Assembly:
* "The committee should not attempt to micro-manage the decision of
the board of directors of the Presbyterian Publishing Corporation. They
were deliberately set apart from the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) according
to the General Assembly."
* "The Presbyterian Publishing Corporation can offer to advertise,
catalog, warehouse and will order for special organizations within or
relating to the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). The Presbyterian Publishing
Corporation does not endorse the materials produced by any
group...providing a detailed service."
* "The resolution as written places the General Assembly Council
(GAC) in the role of the critic of the Presbyterian Lay Committee and the
Presbyterian Publishing Corporation in the role of the censor of the
Presbyterian Lay Committee. These are roles neither body wants...and the
Presbyterian Lay Committee is excluded from this consultation."
Same-sex benefits
In its overture, the Presbytery of the Twin Cities requested that the
Presbyterian Board of Pensions (BOP) explore the feasibility of
implementing a policy by providing same-sex couples in "long-term committed
relationships" the same benefits provided to married couples and to report
its findings to next year's General Assembly. A recommendation on the
matter is expected to come today as discussion is set for 3:15 in the Texas
Ballroom of the Radisson.
The Presbytery noted that a rapidly increasing number of corporations
are granting domestic partner benefits to their employees in same-sex
relationships, including health, dental and vision-care insurance,
beneficiary designations for pensions and other benefits.
Advocates called overture 99-74 a matter of "civil rights" while those
against the overture argued that it's in contradiction of church policy.
"Friends, this is about health-care and bereavement rights. This is
about insurance for loved ones," said Jane Spahr of San Rafael, Calif, an
evangelist who contrary to long-standing PC(USA) policy advocates for the
ordination of gays and lesbians. "This is a civil rights matter. This is
what everyone should have access to. This is not about ordination. This is
about loving someone either of opposite gender or the same gender. It's
about rights of kindness."
Bob Henley, Presbytery of Southern Kansas, urged committee members to
vote against the measure, saying that it would be asking BOP to "contradict
standards by the church's Book of Order.
"The strategy violates the call to sabbatical...that could become a
battlefield," he said.
In other business, the committee unanimously:
* approved the election of Davis Perkins to a second term as
president and publisher of the Presbyterian Publishing Corporation. The
publishing company's board of directors reelected Perkins to another term
on Feb. 22. If confirmed by the Assembly, Davis' term would extend until
the 2002 General Assembly. Perkins became the corporation's first president
and publisher in 1994.
* approved a Board of Pension's recommendation for a 10 percent
increase in retirement and survivor's pension benefits for those receiving
such benefits as of Dec. 31, 1998. The increase, if upheld by the General
Assembly, will go into effect on Aug. 1. Also approved a 10 percent
increase in the accrued credits of both active and inactive members of the
pension plan as of Dec. 31, 1998. It would also be effective Aug. 1 if
approved by the Assembly.
* approved a three percent increase in disability benefits for
disabled members receiving benefits as of Dec. 31, 1998, effective Aug. 1
subject to Assembly approval.
Evan Silverstein
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This note sent by Office of News Services,
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)
to the World Faith News list <wfn-news@wfn.org>.
For additional information about this news story,
call 502-569-5493 or send e-mail to PCUSA.News@pcusa.org
On the web: http://www.pcusa.org/pcnews/
If you have a question about this mailing list,
send queries to wfn@wfn.org
Browse month . . .
Browse month (sort by Source) . . .
Advanced Search & Browse . . .
WFN Home