From the Worldwide Faith News archives www.wfn.org
"Take a Hike" Overtures Draw Battle Lines
From
PCUSA NEWS <pcusa.news@ecunet.org>
Date
21 Jan 2000 20:13:31
21-January-2000
00028
"Take a Hike" Overtures Draw Battle Lines
Between Liberals, Conservatives - and Conservatives
by Alexa Smith
LOUISVILLE, Ky. - Even as he put the finishing touches on what would become
General Assembly Overtures 00-5 and 00-6, the Rev. Jeff Arnold of Butler,
Pa., knew he wasn't drafting a "beloved" piece of legislation.
He was right. The overtures - which politely invite liberals to leave
the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) - raised hackles even in Arnold's own
staunchly conservative presbytery in western Pennsylvania.
Now they're raising hackles nationally, with a half-year to go before
they are due to arrive at the 212th General Assembly in Long Beach, Calif.
The overtures, from the Presbytery of Beaver-Butler, suggest one way of
resolving a longstanding quarrel over the nature of the church - a quarrel
that divides liberals and conservatives along ideological grounds and also
seems to be creating new divisions in the conservative camp, between
hard-liners and moderates and between older traditionalists and younger
evangelicals.
Overture 00-5 asks the General Assembly (GA) to declare that an
"irreconcilable impasse" has developed in the PC(USA) over several
theological and scriptural matters, notably including the question of
permitting the ordination of gay and lesbian candidates for the ministry.
Traditionalists argue that calling any ecclesiastical quarrel
"irreconcilable" is an affront to an all-powerful God.
Overture 00-6 asks the GA moderator to name a task force to explore
changes to the Book of Order that would allow liberals - some of whom say
their consciences require them to defy the denomination's constitution on
the question of ordaining gays and lesbians - to leave the PC(USA) and to
take their property with them. Normally, when a church disbands or leaves
the PC(USA), its property reverts to the denomination. Overture 00-6, its
supporters say, is a pastoral concession aimed at keeping the peace.
Traditionalists object that separating the Body of Christ and
reinventing a church is something close to anathema.
"We're not trying to create division,"Arnold says. "The division
already exists, and nobody has found a way to reconcile the differences."
It is no secret that the PC(USA)'s liberal and conservative camps
disagree, sometimes vehemently. But Overture 00-5 contends that the split
has created "two mutually exclusive theologies" that have evolved into
radically different understandings of:
* God's biblical authority ("whether the Bible is accurate and the Word
God speaks to His entire church with absolute authority, or ... biblical
authority is determined by personal feelings or various academic
disciplines");
* biblical interpretation ("whether the Protestant watchwords - `grace
alone, faith alone, scripture alone' - govern our understanding of the
biblical text or ... we allow other hermeneutic devices such as
justice/love to displace them");
* Jesus Christ ("whether Jesus Christ, through his atoning sacrifice,
is the only means of salvation, or ... there are other means of salvation
such as those revealed in the diversity of human religious and
philosophical traditions");
* salvation ("whether salvation is primarily God's forgiveness of sin,
leading to eternal life and participation in God's church or ... is
primarily freedom from political, social or economic disadvantage");
* ecclesiology ("whether the church is God's creation and governed by
God through Scripture, the Headship of Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit, or
is an institution to be governed by human political processes and notions
of fairness").
"The first amendment (00-5) is the more important," Arnold says. "It
has a simple purpose: to highlight what significant theological differences
exist between the far right and the far left, though we realize those
people are not neatly in camps. We want there to be a theological
discussion ... not about sex and not about homophobia."
Arnold sees this acknowledgment of the division as the beginning of
healing.
"And we want the General Assembly commissioners to address the
irreconcilable impasse," he says. "(To say) if [it] is there, say yes or
no."
Needless to say, the handful of clergy in Beaver-Butler Presbytery who
consider themselves liberals read the overtures as a way of saying, "Don't
let the door hit you on the way out."
Beaver-Butler is a largely rural enclave that is unquestionably one of
the PC(USA)'s most deeply entrenched bastions of conservatism. But the
actual vote on the overtures split the presbytery down the middle: On one
side, the under-35 evangelicals who drafted the overtures (with some
fine-tuning by The Presbyterian Forum, a hard-line coalition that focuses
on grassroots organizing); on the other, older traditionalists who believe
in the classical formulation that the church is Christ's indivisible body,
made by God.
The vote on Overture 00-5 was 61-46. On 00-6, it was 63-50.
"[The overtures give] a limited view of God and God's power ... to say
it is impossible to reconcile," grumbles one minister who is angry that the
debate ever got this far. He says he's disgusted by any ecclesiology that
suggests that the church, which was created and is sustained by God, can be
destroyed and reinvented by humans.
Overture 00-6 isn't the first recent effort by church conservatives to
oust liberals. In 1991 - back before the church's 173 presbyteries passed
the controversial constitutional amendment known as G-6.0106b, which
forbids the ordination of sexually active and "unrepentant" gays and
lesbians - an overture from the Presbytery of San Joaquin (California) took
a much harder line: It proposed to jettison anyone or any PC(USA)
institution that was unwilling to declare homosexual behavior biblically
unsound. That overture was dismissed by that year's General Assembly.
Last year, when two lesbians were chosen to receive the church's "Women
of Faith Award," Beaver-Butler tried to protest the decision, but didn't
get very far - even though a commissioner's resolution similar to Overture
00-6 was circulated at the presbytery's May meeting. The clerk did draft
letters to the denomination's stated clerk, objecting to the choices and
reprimanding the General Assembly Council for its supposed lack of
oversight.
Although those actions bore no immediate political fruit, they did give
rise to an evangelical caucus in the presbytery that has met bi-weekly ever
since and authored this year's overtures.
What's unusual about 00-5 and 00-6 is their call for liberals to leave.
For decades, conservatives have pressured the denomination on various
issues by threatening to take their money and members and leave. That's
been true since the 1920s, when liberal leaders emerged in many mainline
denominations. Nowadays, however, conservatives admit that they have
nowhere to go: They don't fit in with the more fundamentalist stances of
the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA) and the Evangelical Presbyterian
Church(EPC). Moreover, evangelical women don't want to join a denomination
that gives women fewer opportunities for ordained leadership, like the EPC,
or refuses to ordain women at all, like the PCA.
"We don't demonize people, we just think they're mistaken," says the
Rev. Dan Reuter of Prospect, Pa., at 65 the oldest member of the
evangelical caucus, who will be the advocate for the overtures in Long
Beach. "And if this is their conviction (that the church should permit the
ordination of homosexuals), they ought to be able to express it."
Reuter says the provision that defectors may keep their property might
make it possible for some congregations to leave quietly, relieving the
tension that masks theological differences that he thinks are way beyond
repair.
But excision doesn't sit well with traditional conservatives.
Surgical-style solutions seem fundamentally wrong to a generation
raised on an ecclesiology that stresses peace and unity ahead of purity --
and puts peace and unity before purity even in the ordination vows. The
traditionalists are appalled by what they consider a breach of
institutional loyalty, and suspect that 00-5 and 00-6 are a kind of
smokescreen for evangelicals who would like a clause in the Book of Order
that allows for gracious separation - in case a day comes when they would
like to leave. Reuter says that wasn't the impetus for the overtures, but
says the possible "out" probably comforts some conservatives who are deeply
dissatisfied with the PC(USA) and consider the property issue to be
coercive.
The traditionalists say that looking for ways out instead of ways to
stay in is looking at the problem backwards.
"(You have to have) a sense of maturity, a sense of trust that the
denomination recognizes all sorts of diversity, and you also have to trust
the Lord," said the Rev. Bill Jamieson of Butler, a pastoral counselor who
has been a member of the Beaver-Butler Presbytery for 28 years. He
remembers vividly the pain caused by a split in the early 1980s, when five
churches left the denomination because of long-simmering dissatisfaction
with its policies, including the decision to ordain women.
In that case, the presbytery lost the property battle in state court;
the breakaway churches were permitted to take their property with them.
"Where does it stop?" Jamieson says. "It's like that quote from Pastor
Martin Niemoller: `First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak
out because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist. They they came
for the Jews, and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew. Then they
came for me, and there was no one left to speak for me.'"
"Who will be attacked next? Will they come after me because I have a
different view of the church? Where's the unity? Right now it seems like
the one with the most power has the most unity."
For the Rev. Judy Angleberger of Beaver Falls, Pa., a former presbytery
moderator, it's bad enough that the evangelicals are caucusing apart from
the full presbytery. She says she feels sadness and resignation as she
watches presbyters plunge headlong into what she considers the age-old
theological struggle between law and grace.
"Beaver-Butler Presbytery has worked internally over the years to build
a spirit of collegiality," she says. "This kind of organizing may tend to
evade that spirit ... It [cuts] part of us off, and a trust was broken ...
(because it kept) the whole body from working on something together.
"There's a fragmenting of the spirit of the presbytery, from my
perspective as a former moderator."
That's not how the caucus sees it, according to some of its leaders,
including Bob Davis of The Presbyterian Forum. They claim the body is
already broken, and if surgical intervention is what it takes for healing,
that's just what it takes.
For Arnold, the concept of ekklesia ("assembly" in New Testament Greek)
is primary, as the place where the community gathers to do God's work,
God's mission - and mission, as he sees it, is suffering enough. "If we've
ceased to exist for mission, it is possible to dissolve the denomination
without harming the Body of Christ," he says, noting that the Body is
bigger than Presbyterianism and that presbyteries often dissolve local
congregations without harm to the wider denomination.
"I'm not sure we're at that place within the denomination," he says,
"but we're not far from it. That's why we used the word `irreconcilable.'"
Such a stance isn't unusual among the under-35 evangelicals, according
to Davis, who is convinced that less institutional loyalty is reflective of
the times. Some - like the group dubbed "Angry, Young, West-Coast,
Evangelical Pastors" by the Presbyterian Coalition - talk about
"post-denominationalism," in which churches are said to align through
common assent instead of being bound by denominational ties, and Christians
join local churches, not denominations.
Others, like Reuter, describe the local congregation as the locus of
ekklesia, with other levels of a denomination functioning as a service
organization rather than an ecclesial body.
"We don't make or unmake ... the Body of Christ," Arnold says. "It is
bigger than the PC(USA) ... We cannot harm that which God already claimed,
although I don't know anybody in the group that is very happy about any of
this. When the vote was positive, there wasn't celebrating in the streets.
Who's happy?"
The Rev. Laird Stuart of the Covenant Network of Presbyterians (a
coalition of dissenters against G-6.0106b), who says he has heard of
Overtures 00-5 and 00-6 but hasn't seen them in print, says he thinks their
conclusions are too bleak.
"The basic story of faith is that God takes us where we can't get to
ourselves," Stuart says. "And this [the two overtures] is a secular
conclusion, one that does not really believe that God can lead us out of
this crisis."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This note sent by Office of News Services,
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)
to the World Faith News list <wfn-news@wfn.org>.
For additional information about this news story,
call 502-569-5493 or send e-mail to PCUSA.News@pcusa.org
On the web: http://www.pcusa.org/pcnews/
If you have a question about this mailing list,
send queries to wfn@wfn.org
Browse month . . .
Browse month (sort by Source) . . .
Advanced Search & Browse . . .
WFN Home