wfn.org | Possible earliest reference to Jesus found

[NewsDesk <NewsDesk@UMCOM.ORG>]

Oct. 24, 2002 News media contact: Kathy Gilbert7(615)742-54707Nashville,
Tenn.	10-71B{488}

NOTE: A head-and-shoulders photo of the Rev. Ben Witherington is available
at http://umns.umc.org/photos/headshots.html

WILMORE, Ky. (UMNS)-The Rev. Ben Witherington III is in the middle of a
whirlwind dating back to A.D. 63.

A New Testament professor at Asbury Theological Seminary and a writer for
the Biblical Archaeology Review, Witherington, a United Methodist pastor in
the Kentucky Annual Conference, took part in the national announcement Oct.
21 that a limestone ossuary recently discovered in Israel appears to provide
the oldest archaeological evidence of Jesus Christ. 

The ossuary, a box used by Jews at the time of Christ to hold the bones of
the deceased, has a simple but provocative Aramaic inscription: "James, son
of Joseph, brother of Jesus."

"The inscription reads 'James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus,' not 'James,
brother of Jesus, son of Joseph,'" said Witherington.  "We might have
expected the latter if this was a forgery. Also, if we had the latter
inscription it would raise some questions about Jesus' relationship with
Joseph.  As it is written, it simply tells us James" relationship to two of
his close relatives- his father and his brother."

"This inscription is the most important extrabiblical evidence of its kind
that James existed, was someone important, and was the brother of another
early Jew who was very important- Jesus."

It is unusual for the box to have an inscription that refers to a brother,
he said. It was not the usual practice to put a brother's name on the
ossuary unless the brother was someone who was well known, he said. 

"Since the Aramaic here clearly says brother, without qualification, the
natural inference is that James had the same sort of blood kinship to Jesus
as he did to Joseph. In other words, it argues against any theories that
Jesus' brothers were actually his cousins, as according to some later
Catholic traditions."

The limestone box was discovered several years ago after being purchased by
an antiquities dealer in Jerusalem for somewhere between $200 and $700. It
was kept secret while undergoing authentification tests since its discovery.

"I have done my own evaluations, and I am convinced it is the real deal,"
Witherington said. "The box has been out there for 15 years. Clearly it has
been handled by people who were oblivious to its value."

This discovery has some important implications, Witherington said.

"The language of the holy family was, as we have long thought Aramaic, not
Hebrew or Greek. Probably the primary language of the earliest Jewish
Christians in Jerusalem, who likely were responsible for burying James and
inscribing this box with the Aramaic inscription, was Aramaic," he said.

"As the Jewish historian Josephus suggests, James lived and died in
Jerusalem, and now we know he was buried there as well, not in his home
region of Galilee," he added.  Josephus' evidence suggests that James was
killed in A.D. 62, which coincides with the dating of the ossuary.

Witherington said if the burial took place around A.D. 63 it suggests the
Jewish Christians had not yet fled the city, though the Jewish War with Rome
was already percolating.

"It would be my conjecture that the reason the bone box contained no bones
when found is because the Jewish Christians who fled to Pella (according to
church tradition) probably took the bones with them, so his remains would
not be desecrated by the Romans. The bone box was probably too heavy to flee
with, especially if the city was left in haste."

Witherington said the cursive Aramaic inscription helps set a limit on the
period when it could have been written. 

"Acts 21 informs us that Paul met with James in Jerusalem on his last
journey to Jerusalem. This dates to the time when Festus and Felix were the
proconsuls in Judea. This places this event to the period A.D. 58-60,
probably the earlier end of that period," he said. 

"This confirms that James was still alive at that time, and since Paul and
Luke left Jerusalem in A.D. 60, it is probably significant that Luke does
not mention the death of James. This is because it did not occur when he was
there, and he apparently did not know about it after they went to Rome and
Luke wrote Acts."

The next step for Witherington will be to co-write a book about the
discovery with Hershel Shanks, editor of Biblical Archaeology Review. The
Discovery channel will air a special on the find next Easter and the book is
scheduled to be published at about the same time.

"James has long been thought of as a stepbrother. This will ratchet up the
interest in James, which is important."
# # #

*************************************
United Methodist News Service
Photos and stories also available at:
http://umns.umc.org