wfn.org | Commentary: Who is 'right' General Conference delegate?

["NewsDesk" <NewsDesk@UMCOM.ORG>]

Dec. 9, 2002  News media contact: Tim Tanton7(615)742-54707Nashville, Tenn. 
10-71BP{566}

NOTE: A photograph of James W. Lane is available.

A UMNS Commentary
By James W. Lane*

At the 2003 annual conferences of the United Methodist Church, we will be
electing from among ourselves delegates to the 2004 General Conference. There
will be around 1,000 delegates (half lay and half clergy) elected from around
the world to gather in Pittsburgh April 27-May 7, 2004, to open up our United
Methodist Book of Discipline and begin to fine-tune it again.

This is probably not the perfect way to select a representative body for the
church, but it is our way.

Someone said to me recently, "Now if we can just get the right persons
elected ..."

OK, but just who is the right person?

What would that person look and act like?

What would our test be?

Those who have been a part of our delegations in the past will tell you that
it will take a lot of time and energy - not for just the period of April 27 -
May 7, 2004, but for lots of meetings before hand. You will need a lot of
stamina, both physical and mental, for sitting in long meetings and hearing a
lot of dialogue.

Does politics or campaigning have a place in this process? It does if it is
your desire to elect from among yourselves the best campaigner or best
politician. If campaigning were "the thing," I am sure that there are many
out there who could put the Democrats and Republicans to shame on
campaigning!

Maybe just the right kind of campaign literature or campaign button. Oh, I
know, if I just wore the right color clothes! Maybe if I could just get the
right person to write letters for me.

There are always the hot-button issues that get folks riled up. The issues of
human sexuality and reproduction have taken a lot of time, energy and emotion
in past General Conferences. At the 2000 General Conference, some folks got
carried off to jail just so they could "have their say." One day the whole
General Conference was shut down and even some of our church bishops were
arrested, just so they could "have their say." The 
General Conference voting delegates then "had their say." There were lots of
winners and lots of losers that day. It was an extremely sad day for the
church. I got physically ill and came home. You see I love our church that
much!

And then we say, "Well if we could just elect the right person ..."

Who is that "right person?" Is he or she a conservative, a liberal, a
middle-of-the-roader? Is that person Anglo, African American, Hispanic, Asian
American, Mexican American, Native American, male, female? Is he or she
endorsed by United Methodist Women, United Methodist Men, Good News caucus,
Hispanic caucus, Confessing Movement, Black Methodists for Church Renewal,
the local church, etc.?

We proudly proclaim that the mission of the United Methodist Church is to
make disciples of Jesus Christ, and yet when we come to "doing the business
of the church," we return to those age-old habits of politics as usual.

I can tell you that to the average person coming to your United Methodist
Church trying to live out their walk with God, it does not make one whit of
difference who backs whom for what or what the makeup of your ancestry is or
whether you are male or female.

That is not to say that we do not want a representative delegation, but it is
to say that those are not the first criteria.

And then we say, "Well if we could just elect the right person ..."

I asked Virginia who she wanted representing her. You might remember her as
the person addressed in the famous line, "Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa
Claus." Here is what she said.

"First of all I want a person who has a personal, daily, moment-by-moment
relationship with the living Christ.

"A person who has chosen Jesus Christ as the only Lord in their life. One who
has been able to set self aside and let Jesus just take over their life - not
just in the easy times but also in the hard times.

"One who sees worth and value in every other person they meet. One who is
willing to really listen to their brothers and sisters who cry out for
justice.

"One who has stood the test of faithfulness to the United Methodist Church
and continues to be loyal to the church and uphold it with their prayers,
their presence, their gifts and their service.

"One who will not be tossed to and fro by every wind of doctrine. One who has
cast down deep roots and has their anchor caught in the solid rock.

"One who is not willing to sell their soul, or vote, for what is the popular
whim of the day. One who is in church 'every Sunday, on time, with a studied
lesson and an offering for the Lord.'

"One who, with an open mind and Christian integrity, will sit within the
councils and listen to all sides, and then using all of their best
information and judgment, and fervent prayer, cast a vote that they feel that
God wants them to cast."

Virginia says she wants such a person to represent her at the 2004 General
Conference.

Virginia, let it be so. Yes! Let it be so!

# # #

*Lane, of Sherwood, Ark., is past president of the National Association of
Annual Conference Lay Leaders. He delivered the laity address to the 1996
General Conference.

Commentaries provided by United Methodist News Service do not necessarily
represent the opinions or policies of UMNS or the United Methodist Church.

*************************************
United Methodist News Service
Photos and stories also available at:
http://umns.umc.org